Talk:Kender engine

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Physics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics

I am the person who wrote the article. i am wondering whether i am writing this article too early or not. I am a consultant and engineer. I have seen this apparatus work and i am amazed. I have never seen anything like it. It is like a combination of what a Stirling engine can do and what a air heat pump can do. In addition, generates more power. It is quite amazing.83.76.233.60 (talk) 07:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC) Sean[reply]

Per various policies and guidelines, including those on verifiability, notability or "crystal balling", the article does not really stand a chance to remain on Wikipedia as it is, though it has escaped the deletion process once thanks to sloppiness. Could be the best invention ever, we just don't have proper sources to build on. Equendil Talk 08:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, it's too early for a Wikipedia article on this. While it may the best thing since sliced bread and the toaster, it will need to have more significant coverage in reliable sources before it should have an article of its own. Until there's been more coverage, I've redirected it to sterling engine. henrik•talk 19:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]