Jump to content

Talk:Kel-Tec SU-16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Goaliejerryy: I dispute the claim that the SU-16 is more accurate than the Ruger Mini-14. On the contrary, there are articles on the internet, such as this one: http://www.gunblast.com/KelTec-SU16.htm in which the shooter is intimately familiar with both firearms, and concludes that the "Accuracy is on par with the majority of Mini-14s." As such, I feel it inaccurate to state that the SU-16 is more accurate than the Ruger Mini-14.

I also raise issue with the price comparison. Ruger Mini-14'a range more in the $575 to $700 range.

Goaliejerryy: I have edited the section in dispute only to make the section sound less like an advertisement and more like a factual article regarding the SU-16. I changed nothing other than language in certain areas which was favorable and flowery with regards to the SU-16. I was careful to modify only the tone, and not the substance.

AK-47

[edit]

The Kel-tec is in fact not very similar to the Kalashnikov operating system in many ways. While it does have a long stroke gas system where the gas piston is attached directly to the bolt carrier, this is about where the similarities end. In the Kalashnikov series of rifles the bolt carrier is pushed forward by a powerful spring (riding on a telescopic spring guide)that is resting against the rear trunnion. In this system the rifles recoil force and counter push by the spring are all pressing against the rear trunnion of the rifle.

The SU-16 action is much simpler (in my opinion) and compact, it is as far as I have read (having never handled them in real life) very similar to the SIG series of rifles or the Italian AR-70 rifle. The biggest difference is the gas piston *IS* the recoil spring guide. The recoil spring sits around the gas piston, it is attached via a removable gas piston head. The spring PULLS the bolt carrier forward. The recoil forces of the rifle are between the gas piston head and the gas tube's recoil lug resting against the front trunnion.

So in the kel-tec, it eliminates the need for a heavy metal rear trunnion, as only the front trunnion deals with the forces of the bolt carriers movement. Also it has no need for a spring guide, because the gas piston serves that role. Because of all these changes, I feel that it is really not accurate to call it a kalashnikov style gas system as it's only relation in that regard is the single fixed piston, and other rifles use that method also. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.95.73.245 (talk) 10:35, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

Remove picture?

[edit]

Yeah, I know, everyone loves pictures. But what good is the picture of a heavy modified SU-16 made to look like an AR-15 carbine with pistol grip and telescopic stock? The article even mentions that the SU-16 does not have a pistol grip, making it compatible with the more restrictive American states. The folding stock of the SU-16 is an interesting feature, even if only because it shows that the gas system is different from the AR-15 line. Also, it is butt-ugly characteristic. Tierlieb (talk) 12:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you know of another free image that is more suitable, replace it. If not, I think having even the current image is obviously better than having none at all. If you have an SU-16 or you live near a gun store with a stock model (any variant), you could certainly improve the article by snapping a picture and contributing it. The caption on this image does note the after-market modifications, of course. Also, how does the folding stock of the SU-16 say anything about the "gas system" of the AR-15? The only moving part in the AR-15's stock is the recoil buffer spring assembly, which has nothing to do with the gas system which need not be located aft of the receiver. Of course, if you removed the foregrip from each weapon, that would allow the difference in gas systems to be readily apparent (at least in terms of the diameter of the gas tube; the piston in the SU-16 would still be concealed). DickClarkMises (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't own a SU-16 (really hard to get in Germany). So I appreciate your request for another picture and all the work invested. Regarding the "gas system". I figure I translated it wrong when trying to refer to the whole mechanism of the gun, but yes, I was referring to the characteristic buffer tube of the AR-15. This precludes you from using a folding stock like the SU-16 does, unless you change the whatever-the-whole-system-is-called of the AR-15 to use a piston. Tierlieb (talk) 12:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The OA-93 AR-15 pistol was an earlier pistol developed without a recoil buffer tube to the rear of the receiver. However, you are right. The recoil buffer assembly is necessary because the direct impingement gas plumbing doesn't restrain the travel of the bolt like the piston system does. Olympic Arms attempted to solve that by moving the recoil assembly above the bolt. I don't own an SU-16 either, but I am familiar with the PLR-16, which is essentially the same gas piston system. DickClarkMises (talk) 21:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've posted a request in the SU-16 forum at KTOG for someone to take a picture of a stock SU-16 and release it into the public domain. We'll see what happens. DickClarkMises (talk) 20:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would also note that the addition of the pistol grip may be effected using a kit from Kel-Tec, described here: [1]. DickClarkMises (talk) 20:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see. As an alternative picture this makes sense, because I guess we both see the temptation to come closer to the AR-15 looks. But the main idea behind the SU-16 was -in my opinion- to build something differently. A "pc" or "friendly" gun. Like Molot and Saiga are doing it with most of the AK clones they sell. So I would really prefer a picture of the gun in basic configuration. Tierlieb (talk) 12:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would too. That isn't the issue here, though. The issue is whether this image is worse than no image at all. As soon as another image becomes available, we'll add it as the main image at the top of the article. Until then, I am of the opinion that this image, with the caption noting the modifications, offers some value to the encyclopedia article. DickClarkMises (talk) 21:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree on that. Tierlieb (talk) 13:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, mission accomplished. We now have a stock SU-16 for the main image, with the modified rifle pictured below in the "variants" section, which seems to me appropriate. DickClarkMises (talk) 12:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! Tierlieb (talk) 10:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

speaking of pictures, I was rofl at SU16c picture w full size scope —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.239.23.154 (talk) 02:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Echo model

[edit]

I'm not sure how formal it is, but model's with the addition of the pistol grip and stock adapter kit have been dubbed "Echo", leading to their designation being SU-16E. I haven't really been able to find an official source to cite this configuration name, but I feel it should have a place in the article under variants for a "more formal" inclusion of the pistol grip/stock adapter kit as a variant. Since the kit is offered officially by Kel Tec, and the configuration invalidates the folding and collapsable stocks from the Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, and CA models, the new name designation is amiable. -Deathsythe (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ar-10.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Ar-10.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 25 July 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SU-16F

[edit]

Recent edits came through introducing information on a new, Canadian legal variant of the SU-16. The only reputable sources I was able to find was the importer/distributor company's website. Obviously something more official would be better for inclusion into the article, but it is something we should keep our eyes on. It appears they are waiting on Dept. of State approval before KT can start manufacturing and exporting to our neighbors to the north. I'm going to try to put a call into KT sometime today or tomorrow (regarding a separate matter with one of my guns) but will inquire about the SU-16F variant while I have them just for personal verification purposes. If they can forward me any press releases or anything for inclusion, that would be savvy too. -Deathsythe (talk) 13:09, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Kel-Tec SU-16. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kel-Tec SU-16. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kel-Tec_SU-16&oldid=1207940498"