Talk:Keith Stewart

Keith Stewart has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 30, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Maritime / British / European / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Keith Stewart/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Guerillero (talk · contribs) 21:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are there no paintings of him?

Well...yes! This one crops up on a number of amateur sites, but I can find no source or provenance for it. One of these is Stewart, I think #65?, but I can't say for sure and the image is very poor.

I don't think Scotland was a follower of Henry George's philosophy. Is it a property tax?

Charnock calls the position "receiver-general of Scotland", and Haden-Guest terms it "Receiver of land tax in Scotland" or "receiver general of the land tax in Scotland". Past that I really don't know anything about it so am going off the title, but have changed the link to Land Tax (England).

No mention of his youngest son's name?

He died too soon to be recorded in any of the usefully detailed peerages. As far as I can tell the only source people have used before for his name (apparently Edward Charles Stewart) is this amateur site which references it to an email somebody sent them in 2007.

Stewart was also appointed receiver general of land tax in Scotland in 1773, however this position could not actually be held by an MP and so another man officially held it while Stewart continued to collect the salary. In 1783 the salary was instead given to Murray. needs a citation

It is cited to Haden-Guest, but having read the source again I'm re-wording it.

Reading the article is a treat. The flow is excellent. I am most let down by how little we know about Stewart's life. Everything else checks out. --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Guerillero: Hi, thanks for reviewing this! I've replied above. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. A pass -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 23:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]