Jump to content

Talk:Keith Hartwig

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Keith Hartwig/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 19:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I'll review this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Comments

[edit]
  • I copyedited the article here.
  • I archived the reference links.
  • The lead says one season in the NFL, yet it says in the infobox that he was with the Packers in 1978. Maybe clarify.
  • he recorded no statistics is probably not necessary. Instead, maybe say something like "he recorded no tackles on special teams and no receptions on offense".
  • Ref spot checks: #4, 8, 11, 14, 20, 23, 25

Looks good, putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 01:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Keith Hartwig; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: No - Hook is poorly worded and lengthy.

QPQ: No - Not done
Overall: Missing QPQ. To fix the hook issue, I'd remove "and being a backup or injured four of his five collegiate seasons", but I'm open to other ways to improve the wording. Maybe "... that Keith Hartwig overcame an injury he was told would end his career and went on to play in the National Football League?". ––FormalDude (talk) 08:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]