This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland
i hate to be unnecessarily pedantic about this, but just because an article is very short does not make it a stub, particularly when accompanied by a completed infobox, referencing, subsections, images, and categories. please see wp:stub for a full description of what makes an article a stub vs. start. ...by any measure, this article is a 'start'. --emerson716:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that this is a stupid thing to edit war over. WP:STUB says that "stub status usually depends on the length of prose text alone – lists, templates, images, and other such peripheral parts of an article are usually not considered when judging whether an article is a stub." (emphasis added) The article is all of four sentences long (and it could be shorter, since the National Register mention has been uncited since 2007 and could be removed). I don't see how it could be considered anything other than a stub. - Eureka Lott16:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]