Talk:Kathy Feng-Yi Su

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: Asian Month (2019)

This article was created or improved during the Asian Month edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in November 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

https://novataxa.blogspot.com/2017/09/themira-lohmanus.html - new species discovery

Hi @Justanothersgwikieditor: I'm just working on this article, which I think you're right doesn't articulate properly why Su is so important, but I wondered if you had any further suggestions while I tinker with it? Thanks (Lajmmoore (talk) 20:42, 30 November 2019 (UTC))[reply]

@Lajmmoore: I am more of a wiki gnome and fixing maintenance tags as much as possible. For notability guide, WP:ACADEMIC will be good. New species discovery might not be good enough (see the link above which I noted while editing here). Based on criteria, in my opinion, she had not achieved notability yet. So if possible, based on the guide, try to find one that she fit in, find a source and make sure it is in the lead, example "She is a fellow of notable prestigious society.". --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:04, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Justanothersgwikieditor: Thanks (and thanks for the gnome-ingyou do)! She was suggested by Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red so I'm going to go and ask for more advice there. I did use the template - and believe her impact to fit Criterion 1. (Lajmmoore (talk) 09:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC))[reply]

@Lajmmoore:Not sure how they nominate choices but yeah, it will be good for more experienced editors to look through. As said, my experience is mostly wiki gnoming and any articles I created are sportpersons or politicians (notability is never an issue), so they will be better placed to advise. That also means if I think Kathy is not notable does not carry much weight also. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Justanothersgwikieditor: Thanks! I think @Abishe: reviewed this article earlier (thanks!) so I think it's OK's by the WikiWomenInRed team. Thanks both for your help! (Lajmmoore (talk) 18:35, 2 December 2019 (UTC))[reply]