Jump to content

Talk:Kathleen Stock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

subsequent career

[edit]

didn’t she join the staff at an extremely controversial university after leaving Sussex? This is crucial information. 2A01:CB05:54:C200:6944:BD1:F947:D65D (talk) 06:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it’s probably the University of Austin which you’re thinking of. This is mentioned at the end of the Academic career section. Sweet6970 (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
'extremely controversial' - and hysterical UK 'academics' launching a witch hunt against her is, of course, not controversial at all ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.154.17 (talk) 09:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Crucial information to whom? Are you convincing a jury against Kathleen stock? This is outrageous reading Wikipedia is part of the promotion of anti-female rhetoric. Anyone not making way is hateful. I wonder what the AGP wiki states, most likely “debunked theory”. 2600:1006:B185:6EF9:2025:7F9C:79D6:E408 (talk) 02:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 September 2023

[edit]

Edit should be re-applied:

04:44, 10 June 2023‎ Snokalok talk contribs‎  58,022 bytes −7‎  →‎Views on gender self-identification: Removed word “theory”, seemed pov 

Undo was insufficient: "The expression ‘gender identity theory’ is used 4 times in the text of the ES source, as well as in the headline." It does not matter what the link states as it doesn't address the reason for the change, further the link is a book BY Stock, to say it's biased on the topic is an understatement. 24.206.115.25 (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Lightoil (talk) 02:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the lesbian project

[edit]

At the moment the section seems very very overstated for a section which has 3 sources all published within a week of eachother (over a year ago) with only 1 or 2 rs. Looking for more recent sources I couldn't find anything post march 2023 actually about the project.

Given the above I would think it best to either delete the entire section or move it to a subsection (titled the lesbian project) under views on gender self-identification and trim it down to remove the promotion feel it currently has.

I'll give the 2nd suggestion a go over the next couple of days but I'm starting the conversation here. LunaHasArrived (talk) 11:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just realised the article is ECP so I won't be able to edit LunaHasArrived (talk) 11:44, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]