This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
There is some great information here! May I suggest that you begin sorting it with headers, expand upon and add to them and write a concise lead? From what is here it does make me want to learn more about Kate Gordan!
Deltagolf34 (talk) 03:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Deltagolf34, there is already a lot of great information starting to come together in this article. I also agree that it is a matter of concise organization and further research to fill in missing gaps. There is a good amount of info dealing with Gordon's professional life. Based on the information so far, it seems like there is an oppurtunity to structure the article around both Gordon's career and actions in the political arena. The challenging aspect is finding more biographical information, which is difficult with some of the more recent figures. As far as the tone, the article reads encyclopedic and non-partisan. Also, I don't notice any grammar errors. Overall, I think there is a good amount of interesting information here and I will be interested to read more about Gordon and her career. Good luck! --TylerDC25 (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that some of the information in this article could be expanded upon. For example, in the reference to her interview on the Rachel Maddow show, it would be great if more information was given on the nature of the interview and what was exchanged. Also, the mention of the bill brought before Congress in 2009 could give more information on the bill itself or even a hyperlink to an article on the bill. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barnardandy1 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that some of the information in this article could be expanded upon. For example, in the reference to her interview on the Rachel Maddow show, it would be great if more information was given on the nature of the interview and what was exchanged. Also, the mention of the bill brought before Congress in 2009 could give more information on the bill itself or even a hyperlink to an article on the bill. Barnardandy1 (talk) 15:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Andy Barnard[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}