User talk:Deltagolf34
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Deltagolf34, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:41, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Deltagolf34, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Feedback request
[edit]
Hi. I moved your draft back to your sandbox - it isn't ready for mainspace yet. I have linked to two of our brochures for editing articles. You should have gotten a hardcopy of the first one. Review the sections on article layout in the Editing Wikipedia brochure (pages 7-9) and before you move your work to the article space, you should go over the checklist on page 15. The second brochure has advice for writing biographies - some of the types of sections you should include, how you should present the information. Since this is an article about a living person it's especially important to make sure that each statement in the article can be directly traced to its supporting citation - you can't just include two references at the end.
(If you reply to this message here, please include {{ping|Ian (Wiki Ed)}} in your response, to ensure that I see your reply.)
Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Your proposed article
[edit]First of all, unattached talk pages usually just get deleted as they are without means of support. OK. You said, "I would like to write an article for Jane Wright. I know the interview on this page can't be used because it may contain bias from the interviewer and Jane Wright. The page does include a list of her works which can be used as sources if I get permission and cite them. https://www.science.org.au/learning/general-audience/history/interviews-australian-scientists/dr-jane-wright-entomologist ". Wikipedia doesn't work like academia. There, citations are to a person's works. Here, it's coverage in reliable independent sources that counts - see WP:RS. No reference here needs permission from the author to be used (and no article needs permission from the subject to be written and posted. If they're not published, they can't be used - there's none of the "unpublished communication from Fred Bloggs" type of thing. If they are published, they need to pass RS. It's what reliable people have written about Wright that matters more than what SHE has written (Bill Miggs has written 50 papers, and self-published them, and no-one has even read them...). What you need to do is talk to MelanieN or Ritchie333 (add user talk: in front of those in the search bar). They are both good at rescuing things and explaining how articles need to be built. (Me, I'm an axeman not a builder...) Good luck. BTW you can use an interview as source of info, but you do need to back it up with RS sources too. ("Fred said, "My first book was the Field Guide to the Micromoths of Antarctica - published by Vanessa Papillon Books in 1976" is info. You could reference it to a review somewhere like New Scientist or Nature. Everything must be worded by you (Bloggs was the first to publish a guide to the micromoth population of Antarctica, which caused great interest as no-one had found any there before where you are using extra info from the review), but a brief quote from her is acceptable if it's something fairly iconic or otherwise important. Large chunks of quote are copyvio as they're hard to justify. Peridon (talk) 17:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Peer Reviewer for HSCI-3023
[edit]Hey man, I'm Luke from HSCI. This article looks pretty adequate and I agree with the comments you made in October. One thing that is lacking from the article is comments about the Williams Route 66 and the Center of the Universe detour that is included in that marathon -- it might be an interesting addition to the article and could link to the Route 66 Marathon page. Here's a link for more information. http://route66marathon.com/participate/center-of-the-universe-detour/ Other than that I would just add information about the present years, as you have suggested. Lukeydukey24 (talk) 22:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukeydukey24 (talk • contribs)