Talk:Karl Oliver

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Karl Oliver article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

United States: Mississippi Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Inclusion of singular op-ed opinion in article

There appears to be some disagreement on whether the following sentence should be included in its current state: "An editorial in the Mississippi Clarion-Ledger stated that the apology did not go far enough, and called for Oliver to resign for his statements."

I am of the opinion that the point of view of one newspaper, presented alone gives undue weight to that viewpoint. Further, the point of view expressed is not also expressed by other reliable sources. I struggle to see the relevance of an op-ed calling for a politician to resign. Lest it turn into an edit war, can we get a consensus on the inclusion of this line?

Funcrunch (talk · contribs) K.e.coffman (talk · contribs) Morty C-137 (talk · contribs) PvOberstein (talk · contribs)

Cjhard (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really think it belongs in the article, but didn't feel strongly enough to remove it when I edited to clarify that it was an editorial. Funcrunch (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Clarion-Ledger is, functionally, the paper of record for the state of Mississippi. That is different from it being just "one newspaper" as if it were merely the town paper of Bumshart, Nebrahoma (population 24 + cows) or something similar. Morty C-137 (talk) 16:45, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Although I think it's quite irrelevant to the point, on what basis are you saying that it's 'functionally the paper of record'? If you find some reliable sources for such a reputation I'd highly recommend adding it to the newspaper's article. Cjhard (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]