Talk:Kapingamarangi

Micronesia: Federated States of Micronesia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MicronesiaTemplate:WikiProject MicronesiaMicronesia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Federated States of Micronesia (assessed as High-importance).

Polynesia Mid‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Untitled

The following seems not to make sense: "Kapingamarangi has a population of about 700, most of whom live on Pohnpei." The island of Pohnpei is ~750km away from Kapingamarangi. If you live on Pohnpei, how can you be considered part of Kapingamarangi's population? If, on the other hand, "Pohnpei" is referring to the state of Pohnpei, then everyone in Kapingamarangi lives in Pohnpei. Right? It's entirely possible, though, that I'm just reading something wrong. : ) Fried Gold 17:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're not reading anything wrong. That's what it said in plain English, and it was utter nonsense. I have to use the past instead of the present, because I already removed the statement in question. However, the current resident population of the atoll is around 500, not 700. So I cannot rule out that the 700 figure (which I could not verify anywhere) would include some 200 Kapingamarangi Polynesians who moved to the state's main island of Pohnpei.--Ratzer (talk) 09:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Judging by Kapingamarangi language, I'm guessing this is referring to people of the Kapingamarangi ethnicity? Mcavoybickford (talk) 22:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Other image

File:Kapingamarangi ISS006E07219.png -- AnonMoos (talk) 13:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guedes, Coroa, Pescadores y Ocea conforman la Micronesia española, un conjunto de islas que legalmente pertenecen a España. Estas posesiones de ultramar no fueron contemplados ni en el tratado hispano-estadounidense, firmado en París el 10 de diciembre de 1898, ni en el Tratado germano-español en el que se vendía al Imperio alemán los archipiélagos de Carolinas, Palaos y Marianas, excepto la isla de Guam, realizado en Madrid el 30 de junio de 1899. Por tanto, tal y como descubrió el investigador del CSIC D. Emilio Pastor y Santos en el año 1949, España podría hacer legalmente una reclamación de soberanía ante las Naciones Unidas. Lo que ocurre es que al día de hoy y en tanto no se le encuentre un desarrollo económico adecuado, el Gobierno de España no las ocupa de forma permanente ni las reclama como posesiones propias. Desde luego sería imprescindible contar con la población de estas islas, la cual tendrían derecho a la nacionalidad española, respetando sus tradiciones, usos, costumbres y lengua.

FUENTE: http://www.abc.es/20110701/espana/abci-desconocidas-islas-espanolas-pacifico-201107011608.html

Fernando de Laguno - Málaga - España

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.60.247.141 (talk) 12:43, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Link

Tried to follow an external link (Kapingamarangi and Nukuoro diving and science expedition 1969) and got this error message:

This blog is open to invited readers only http://realpolynesia.blogspot.com/

Cpergielx (talk) 22:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kapingamarangi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kapingamarangi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080410233458/http://www.botany.hawaii.edu/faculty/duffy/arb/048-50/49.pdf to http://www.botany.hawaii.edu/faculty/duffy/arb/048-50/49.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]