Talk:Kafr Ein

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Mills, E., ed. (1932)-data, is it there?

I cannot find it here; but there are several names in the Ramallah-section which I do not recognise....Kafr Ein might be one of them. Huldra (talk) 23:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you identify 'In Kafr that is listed there? On maps I only see "Kafr Ein" or "Kafr 'Ein" though. Another factoid is that it does not appear in the lists of villages in each sub-district which appeared in the Gazette every time the boundaries were changed. This suggests it was considered part of a nearby village, such as Qawarat Bani Zeid. On the other hand, the 20K cadastral map (16-16) shows a substantial built-up area and village lands for it. Zero^talk 00:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: it appears in the Gazette lists 1940–1945.

In the 1931 list there is In Kafr but not Kafr Ein while in the 1945 list there is Kafr Ein but not In Kafr. Hmmmmm... 00:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

...and In Kafr has 494 inhabitants...pretty much half-way between Kafr Ein`s 1922 number (=376) and 1945 number (=550).....I think we have a winner! Thanks.. Huldra (talk) 20:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably, but it is hard to prove. I see "Kefr Ain" in a 1924 village list. I don't see any other mention of "In Kafr". On the way I noticed a passage about the women of "Kefr Ain" in Wilson's "Village Life", pp78–79, probably worth inclusion. Zero^talk 23:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I take the chance on it being this place: I cannot see what else it could be. As for Wilson, 1906, pp. 78-79; I believe he refers to females of the Barghouti-family (of which there undoubtedly also were some in Kafr Ein), but not about the women of the village generally. Btw, he writes much the same as Stuart Macalister, 1905, p. 255: I wonder if he more or less copied him? Huldra (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kafr Ein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101210081942/http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_PCBS/Downloads/book1487.pdf to http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_PCBS/Downloads/book1487.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]