Talk:Kabul Zoo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles

Central Asia Mid‑importance

	Asia portal Kabul Zoo is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Afghanistan

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal

I propose merging Pig of Afghanistan here. It falls afowl of WP:NOTNEWS, WP:BLP1E, and WP:N due to the udder lack of in-depth coverage. cab (talk) 06:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If merged, keep a redirect in Category:Famous pigs. PamD (talk) 07:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But I disagree about WP:BLP1E - not a person! PamD (talk) 07:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or perhaps merge it with the other article Khanzir. KimChee (talk) 23:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think it should be merged in since Khanzir is barely notable. --MarsRover (talk) 05:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Khanzir having his own article enables him to be included in the category "Famous pigs" - which he most certainly qualifies for. Plus, he's not famous just for one incident, but for his status. Aridd (talk) 07:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He may remain in the spotlight too as there is talk about his loneliness and need for a female companion. I predict that within a few months he will have a friend and be in the news again. Drawn Some (talk) 07:32, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

True, pigs need love too. But his notability will diminish since he would then be one of two pigs.--MarsRover (talk) 08:05, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Historical notability remains. Διγουρεν_{Εμπρος!} 09:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a striking need to merge this. Both of the topics are easy to understand without in-depth explanation of the other, and the concepts are reasonably well-defined. Notability is not a problem, either. Διγουρεν_{Εμπρος!} 20:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kabul Zoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714161537/http://www.nczoo.com/News/archive/20050908154106238 to http://www.nczoo.com/News/archive/20050908154106238

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]