Talk:KKE Architects
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
CSD tagging
[edit]Contest. With a couple sources and a few tweaks, it will be a fine article. Airplaneman talk 15:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Removed tag. Put
This article contains promotional content. |
in it's place. Airplaneman talk 17:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
All information is now verifiable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KKEmarketing (talk • contribs) 19:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Refs
[edit]Since I work at KKE I cannot edit this article, but I'm hoping someone else would find a way to fix or delete any advertisement-like text. It was suggested that a citation be used for the key people and the branch locations. Two articles can provide proof of that: "Minneapolis-based KKE Architects elects Randy Lindemann to board" by Finance and Commerce Staff Report, Finance and Commerce Daily Newspaper, 2007 and "Minneapolis-based KKE Architects expands presence in southwest" by Brian Johnson, Finance and Commerce Daily Newspaper, 2008. If someone would suggest additional citations that are needed, I would be happy to help search for those. Then I'm hopeful that someone would remove the two tags on the article. KKE Architects is mentioned in multiple articles, including East Lake Community Library and McNamara Alumni Center. Stacy Maureen (talk) 14:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I will be happy to do that. If you have any more refs, please feel free to drop them off here and I will see if they fit into the article. If they do, I'll add them. Airplaneman talk 16:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I'm removing the "refimprove" tag, but that does not mean that there can't be more refs (the more the better). Just make sure they're reliale ;). Airplaneman talk 16:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC)