Jump to content

Talk:KZDG

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:KFRC (AM))

Fair use rationale for Image:KYCY2005.jpg

[edit]

Image:KYCY2005.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KYCY2005.jpg

[edit]

Image:KYCY2005.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article about the frequency, not the history of the station

[edit]

This article is about the history of stations at the frequency 1550 AM, not about KFRC per se. That's a pity, as the history of KFRC (at 610 AM) is much more interesting. And, not to mention, it would be much more linear if the article were about the station with the KFRC call letters, no matter what frequency it was at on the dial. Moncrief (talk) 03:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on KZDG. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:KGMZ (AM)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 00:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Infobox looks good.
  • Add a serial comma after "CBS Radio".
  • Other than that, the lead looks good as well.

History

[edit]
  • "several staff" doesn't sound right as staff already refers to more than one person. Try rewording.
  • "Eastern time" → "Eastern Time"
  • "new combined" → "newly combined"
  • this isn't correct for the particular case, I've left this alone
  • "require a divestiture" → "require divestiture"
  • Add a serial comma after Ajay Bhutoria.
  • Looks like someone added this during the nom—I've trimmed it back but retained one fact with an added source.
  • Add a comma after "June 3, 2019" per MOS:DATECOMMA.
  • "on August 2018" → "in August 2018"

Transmitter site

[edit]
  • "king tide" should link to king tide.
  • "as king tide" → "as a king tide" or "as king tides"

References

[edit]
  • Archive all archivable sources, including that first PDF.

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

@Some Dude From North Carolina: All the changes should be made. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:34, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 01:35, 27 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article was promoted to GA within the seven days this was created. The article also is long enough and within policy. As for the first hook its behind a paywall but it does look to meet the criteria for format and content to be on DYK. the second hook doesn't look as interesting in comparison, imo. GamerPro64 20:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:KZDG&oldid=1207537094"