Talk:Justin Cook

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 September 2021. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of One Piece characters#Eustass Kidd|Eustass Kid]] The anchor (#Eustass Kidd) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Notabililty

It is very easy to demonstrate notability, simply make reference to some in-depth articles about the subject to prove that he has been talked about by commentators or academics. It is not enough simply to be a minor player in the big wide world of film, someone outside WP must recognise his significance enough to warrant articles or discussion about him. Don't take the even easier route and just delete the tag - do him the credit of demonstrating the point, see Wikipedia:Notability: "A topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject itself and of each other. Notable is defined as 'worthy of being noted' or 'attracting notice'. It is not synonymous with 'fame' or 'importance'. It is not measured by Wikipedia editors' own subjective judgements. Notability is generally permanent." Abtract 08:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I understand the importance of notability but I'm a bit surprised you don't think the credits listed on the article are enough. The article should be expanded and the notability should be better stated, but we do know from those credits that he is notable. -- Ned Scott 05:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No doubt he does lots of good stuff but do others think him sufficiently notable that they have written "multiple, non-trivial published works" in "sources that are reliable and independent of the subject"? Presumably not or they would be quoted in the article. Look, this is not a big deal but there is so much in WP that has no references and is about subjects that are of no interest to anyone but the originator, that, when I come across a double dose like this, I draw attention to it :) Abtract 09:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is a guideline, something to help us to say on the path of good article topics, not some policy like WP:V where we have to prove notability from multiple sources that are independent. You really have no place to demand this, and you are really missing the point of our notability guidelines. -- Ned Scott 20:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could explain which point I am missing Abtract 00:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We set notability criteria to prevent Wikipedia from including things that really are of no significant value as far as information goes. We'd have so many articles that it would pretty much be.. like the web over-all, and impossible to maintain. In addition it also helps discourage vanity articles, articles with likely wouldn't have proper sources, and helping to keep things verifiable. Notability should be stated in some form in an article, but it doesn't have to be proven (in the same way that sources are) to the reader. -- Ned Scott 01:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't see the problem ... if this guy is so notable then it must be simplicity itself to demonstrate it by making reference to some articles published by creditable sources. He obviously works well at his chosen profession but that alone doesn't make him notable. Surely someone can come up with even one article written about this supposedly notable person? :) Abtract 02:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't understand, it is not required that someone declare someone notable or not. That is simply one way we might determine notability, but there are other ways as well. This voice and staff credits do just that. -- Ned Scott 02:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are appropriate references to Justin Cook's notability now, so would it be alright to remove the tag? --EmperorBrandon 19:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A pleasure doing business with you all :) Abtract

Voice Credits

How can this guy and Kyle Hebert both be the voice of Ezreal in League of Legends? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.27.77.242 (talk) 06:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]