This redirect is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia
There has been an argument that the name if the murderer should not be mentioned as it “gives attention to the perpetrator” and “is not necessary. This is an encyclopedic entry, not a memorial and when information is being written about the death of Vankulič specifically, I feel that it is information that should remain. See other articles of murder individuals, it typically always mention the name of the murderer in the Death section as it literally the person that caused the death and is vital in that section. Enlightened Southerner (talk) 11:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Star Mississippi OK, but I removed it because it was not cited here. It may eventually become a moot point if the article is deleted, but I feel any named criminal should have a reliable citation to them in this article, and @Enlightened Southerner does need to be enlightened on this important point. They are also free to address it, assuming they're attempting to 'keep' the article. Nick Moyes (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
oh I have no objection to your removal @Nick Moyes. I just offered it as a way to meet @Enlightened Southerner's desire to have the name here assuming the source there doesn't also fail verification as that article has many issues of its own. I'm still fascinated by two new editors so focused on this subject. StarMississippi17:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]