Jump to content

Talk:Junkers F 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Check your article on Lloyd Aereo which says that Bolivia got a Junkers f.13 in 1925. 201.224.125.104 20:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Panama_bobhardin@yahoo.com[reply]

Maiden flight

[edit]

The French & German articles state that it flew on 28 June 1919, not 25. Can anyone confirm either date? Drutt 16:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 25 June 1919 is given by Turner and Nowara in Junkers: an aircraft album 3.TSRL (talk) 09:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Point point

[edit]

Since there is a redirect it's likely that someone has a reason for writing F.13 rather than F 13. No big deal, but we do use e.g. Junkers W 33 and W 34, with no dot. The W (Wasserflugzueg) and the F (Flugzueg) come from the same set of designation letters, so we should be consistent. For what it's worth, Turner and Nowawra (ref above: latter is knowledgeable) use no dot.TSRL (talk) 09:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ref for data

[edit]

Does anyone have the source for the data quoted under Specifications for the F.13de? If not, I can provide those for the -fe from Turner & NowaraTSRL (talk) 20:40, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft on display

[edit]

... is the usual header, and it comes with two sub-headings which I've used to group some new and useful data from User:A75. Rather than cite the intermediary Hugo Jupiter site, I've found cites to museum pages. Also added Wikilinks. Non-flown replicas are usually regarded as non-notable, so I've dropped them and the (?) Swedish model.TSRL (talk) 19:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Junkers F.13. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Junkers F.13. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Engine is wrong

[edit]

Obviously this aircraft is powered by a radial or a rotary engine, not an inline. that or you have the wrong photo, because that is a radial! 2001:818:DDA3:B400:ECCA:A727:C417:B8AB (talk) 16:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Please don't call the photo of the replica (first photo of the article) an "F 13". This is a bad-looking replica. You should put a photo of the 1919 original F 13 at the top of the article, see e.g. the German wikipedia article on the F 13, or the version exposed in the Deutsches Museum in Munich (shown in another photo later in the article). The original has a water-cooled inline engine, which looks rectangled, not circle round as the air-cooled engine of the replica. The air-cooled more resembles the three motors of the Ju 52/3. 2A02:AA16:1101:E300:CC6:A07A:E1BA:B51F (talk) 00:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Junkers_F_13&oldid=1248702317"