Jump to content

Talk:July 2012 Beijing flood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gdoman1. Peer reviewers: Mhubbe2.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this article deleted in the Polish Wikipedia?

[edit]

Garbled Machine Translation:

Flooding in China in 2012 [edit] Flooding in China in 2012 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | register) Repeatedly reset the password for the current event. Removed several times with similar justifications that the password is suitable for Wikinews, not Wikipedia. The author does not want to understand, and because the edits from the IP communication difficult. I ask for opinions. Pablo000 (Talk) 7:53, 25 July 2012 (CEST)

I put interwiki, but I have mixed feelings. In Poland, several dozen deaths and a loss of a billion dollars would be clearly visible event and having a clear impact on the economy ... but that in China too? An article on this (for now) is not convincing. Talk Margoz 8:21, 25 July 2012 (CEST)
"On 21 July 2012" - it's suitable for Wikinews - so far, this news release and not the password. Encyklopedycznością problem I see if the information is correct. - Bulwersator (Talk) 8:33, 25 July 2012 (CEST)
News without sources. For Wikinews, if it is proved that in the future encyklopedyczność why not. Wikipedia is not a directory, including the catalog of any natural disaster, if it somehow did not affect significantly the environment. Wojciech Pędzich Discussion 9:08, 25 July 2012 (CEST)
I added this way, the source of the article to another was easy to find, because for me to add the sources is a problem 46.169.85.58 (Talk) 9:23, 25 July 2012 (CEST) 9:21, 25 July 2012 (CEST).
As it turns out that the flooding has had a long-term, not temporary encyklopedyczność - is yes. But aktutalnie is one of the events, which each year there are hundreds. Plus the fact that in contrast to eg enwiki, our "slogan" better not be. The creation of the wick and the wick will hang for years. Masur Juhu? 9:34, 25 July 2012 (CEST)
To Wikinews. Hoa Binh (Talk) 9:42, 25 July 2012 (CEST)
Flooding in China in 2012 that hit Beijing and during the day the floods, 56.933 people were evacuated, while the flooding killed at least 95 people. In total, it should fly EK-ding for the language, I do not know when it pursued. A bit like Polish, but not really. Hoa Binh (Talk) 10:13, 25 July 2012 (CEST)
It went on Wikinews: n: In the second half of July heavy rainfall caused flooding in China, there to welcome the improvement and expansion. Marek Mazurkiewicz (Talk) 11:53, 25 July 2012 (CEST)
Removed. Thank you for your expression. Pablo000 (Talk) 17:11, 25 July 2012 (CEST)

Posted par ~AH1 (discuss!) 21:56, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Recent urban flooding in China

[edit]

 I added a section on the urban flooding events in China around the time of the Beijing flood to add more detail about societies influence on the disturbance and the severe urban flooding China has been experiencing recently. Some of the information already in the article gave great examples of this and I put it under the section as well. I think this contribution gives insight into urban flooding and how it is affecting China. Gdoman1 (talk) 18:50, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on July 2012 Beijing flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]