Talk:Joseph Morton Ransdell

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Contemporary philosophy

Article name

Ransdell is known informally as "Joe Ransdell" but is generally published as "Joseph Ransdell" or "Joseph M. Ransdell". His full name is "Joseph Morton Ransdell".

There is a Joseph E. Ransdell. The Joseph Ransdell page is currently a redirect to Joseph E. Ransdell.

I'd suggest that "Joe Ransdell" be moved to "Joseph M. Ransdell". As for the "Joseph Ransdell" page, if it remains a redirect to "Joseph E. Ransdell", then, in that case, an "other use" template should be placed atop the "Joseph L. Ransdell" page

One could also make "Joseph Ransdell" into a redirect to a "Joseph Ransdell (name)" page which would work like a disambiguation page, but since there is only one other "Joseph Ransdell" currently in Wikipedia, it wouldn't be considered worth it. An "other uses" template atop the "Joesph E. Ransdell" page would accomplish the same end more economically.

However I have checked Wikipedia article traffic statistics for "Josesph Ransdell" (here) and "Joseph E. Ransdell" (here. The October traffic to "Joseph E. Ransdell" page was 279, with three days missing, so it was probably more like 300, avg. almost 10 a day. The October traffic to the "Joseph Ransdell" page was only 48 (probably more like 51), avg. almost 2 a day. So, four out of five looking for Senator Joseph Ransdell go straight to "Joseph E. Ransdell." I believe that the majority of people looking for the philosopher Joseph Ransdell would type in "Joseph Ransdell", since that is how he is best known. So there's a good argument for making "Joeseph Ransdell" a redirect to "Joseph M. Ransdell" and placing the following template atop "Joseph M. Ransdell"

(Note: The Wikipedia article traffic statistics site does not include, in a page's traffic, traffic from a redirect page. I learned this in tracking traffic to "Charles Peirce" and "Charles Sanders Peirce", which switched redirect roles a while back. When "Charles Peirce" became a redirect to "Charles Sanders Peirce", the stats page continued to show it as having much, much higher traffic than "Charles Sanders Peirce". That continued until I tweaked the wikilinks in referring Wikipedia articles to link directly to "Charles Sanders Peirce" instead of "Charles Peirce". This may or may not reflect that traffic is driven mainly by wikilinks; it may also have to do with how Google decides to list a wiki page as primary - it has the highest number of pages linking to it. Also note, I've found that, when typing an article name into the stats page's search field, it tends to work more reliably if one types all in lower case.) The Tetrast (talk) 17:29, 22 November 2009 (UTC). Edited The Tetrast (talk) 17:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC). Edited The Tetrast (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Morton Ransdell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091203103238/http://www.peircesociety.org/contents.html to http://www.peircesociety.org/contents.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]