Jump to content

Talk:Joseph Kinnicutt Angell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk08:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Kinnicutt Angell
Joseph Kinnicutt Angell

Created by Kavyansh.Singh (talk). Self-nominated at 14:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work!.

Mainly 14:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Joseph Kinnicutt Angell/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 11:57, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:57, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:21, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image is appropriately tagged.

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Kavyansh.Singh, just checking in -- I know you wanted to look for other sources, but I think if you want to pass this, just removing the vague sentence and incorporating the info about the journal from Mott would be enough. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Christie: Hi! So I researched about this last week in the Google books], Internet archive, and other online sources. From what I saw and read, it is indeed apparent that he continued editing it, so I've just rephrased and added a bit. Didn't add about "and Review", as it is not too related to Angell. Does it work? – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:34, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That works; passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source title

[edit]

Kavyansh.Singh, I realized after I promoted this to GA that I should have been doing spotchecks. I've done them now, and there were no issues, but I did spot a source title issue that I think needs to be fixed. The citation to Hopkins gives a link to a Google Books scan, with page numbers, but that scan file has multiple books so the page numbers repeat. I would suggest using the title of the actual book, not the Google file. As far as I can see that's Rhode Island Historical Tracts No. 11. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:41, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kavyansh.Singh, just following up on this. I'll probably change it myself if you don't respond, but I didn't want to mess with your citation in case I was misunderstanding something about the source file. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 20:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mike Christie: Sorry for the delay, IRL commitments have made me pay less attention to Wikipedia, so I missed your ping. I have now fixed the title of that source; thanks for pointing that out! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:46, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem -- thanks for fixing it. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]