Talk:Jonathan Hellyer

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

England

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Bronski Beat in 1985.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 09:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Article is not currently a 5x expansion; no prejudice against renomination if the article is promoted to GA status.

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Jonathan Hellyer has a falsetto and sung with Eartha Kitt and Bronski Beat?
- Reviewed:
- Comment: He is a lesser known singer of a band that helped to pave the way for gay rights and LGBTQ. This singer sung with one of the most known femaie singers ever, Eartha Kitt and he also has done the Dame Edna Experience.

Improved to Good Article status by DragonofBatley (talk). Self-nominated at 18:29, 14 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Hellyer; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Hi DragonofBatley (talk), unfortunately I don't think this article currently meets the DYK eligibility criteria. It needs to either be a new article, expanded more than five times in length (I count a little over 2x expansion from the pre-existing version) or promoted as a WP:Good Article. If you think you can add enough content to get it to 5x expansion I am happy to look again in a few days, but otherwise your best bet might be to take it through the Good Article process - Dumelow (talk) 11:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Dumelow:, I have added more sources and content to the article. More to his career, personal life and a discography with sources. Do you feel it could be up to Did You Know? standards? Thanks DoB DragonofBatley (talk)

Hi DragonofBatley. The test is a purely quantitative one, the number of characters in the proposed article (excluding references, headers, lists etc.) must be at lest five times as many as in the pre-expansion article. I measure 1,338 characters in this version from 2 April and 2,692 characters in the current version. You'd have to add almost 4,000 characters of text to meet the requirement, which would be a significant amount of work. There are other criteria too, which you can read here. One thing that would need to be addressed is citations, we normally require a minimum of one citation per paragraph, some of those in the current article have no citations at all. This would be of concern, particularly as the article subject is still alive. As I say, the expansion might be too much to ask, if so you could try to bring the article up to the WP:Good Article standard; new GAs are eligible to feature on DYK too - Dumelow (talk) 05:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]