Jump to content

Talk:Jonathan Beaulieu-Richard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jonathan Beaulieu-Richard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk16:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Muboshgu (talk) and Cmm3 (talk). Nominated by Muboshgu (talk) at 17:48, 29 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Muboshgu The article is good. However, earwig is reporting a 78.5% possible violation. If you can either fix or explain why this is the case then I will approve the nomination. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onegreatjoke:, my antivirus program prevented me from visiting the site that is labeled as the violation. I am not certain, but that site could be a WP:MIRROR of Wikipedia, copying from us. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I guess i'll approve the article however if the promoter decides otherwise then i'm sorry. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure it's a mirror. Just look at https://dead-or-death-hoax.com/about/. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://dead-or-death-hoax.com/privacy-policy/ notes that they "use Aggregate Information". – Muboshgu (talk) 20:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
T:DYK/P2