Talk:Joie de vivre

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Copyright: AE 2007

This is a beautiful way of thinking. As an existentialist, it is sometimes hard to see the meaning of life. The meaning I have found is hidden in the phrase "La Joie de Vivre". The meaning of life is to be happy and to enjoy one's life. The only things that are worthwhile are those actions that will contribute positively to the world; to one's own or someone else's happiness. This communal selfishness will improve the world and one's personal life.

thanks i'll get right on editing that into the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.228.130.101 (talk) 22:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

comment

Edited the thread above which was untitled, used the ludicrous text that was between what are now the 1st and second entries. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neoliberal Triumph.

With the neoliberal triumph, the term has gone into partial, but hopefully not total, eclipse.[7]

Can someone please burn this sentence with fire? The brutal crowbarring of a whine about post modern cultural hegemony makes me want to self harm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.100.219.45 (talk) 08:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]