Talk:John Tavares/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Checklist

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Very well written, I enjoyed reading it.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Extensive sourcing, well-done.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I love seeing self-taken photos, and these are great action shots. Good job on those.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Great article, I really enjoyed reading and reviewing it. I would recommend nominating for FA status.

CanadianNine 19:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)