Talk:John Surratt

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Dates

This article gives conflicting dates for his trial and acquittal:

On September 15, 1865, Surratt fled to England and later to Rome. He joined the Papal Zouaves. When his whereabouts was discovered he went to Alexandria, Egypt. There he was arrested on November 27, 1866. Surratt was brought back to the United States and went on trial for murder on June 10, 1867. The jury heard 80 witnesses for the government and 90 witnesses for the defense. The trial ended August 10 with the jury deadlocked (4 votes = guilty; 8 votes = not guilty). Eventually, Surratt was freed in the summer of 1868. He had benefited from the fact that he had been tried by a civil court. To read an excellent account of the trial, please see the article entitled The Case of John Harrison Surratt, Jr. by John F. Doyle in the March, 2000, edition of the Surratt Courier.

Which account is correct? Drutt 08:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Surratt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090720233738/http://www.concharto.org/search/eventsearch.htm?_tag=john+surratt&_maptype=0 to http://www.concharto.org/search/eventsearch.htm?_tag=john+surratt&_maptype=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question Involving When John Surratt met Booth

I just finished reading John H. Surratt's diary, and noticed in it, it seems to conflict with this Wikipedia page. This page says that Surratt was introduced to John Wilkes Booth in 1864 by Dr. Mudd, shortly before the kidnapping plot, but his diary implies that he knew Booth at least around February 20th, 1861, as evidenced on this page. The Booth referred to could potentially be a different one, but it is implied to be John Wilkes Booth, due to his acquaintance with a mysterious woman that continues after it was confirmed to be John Wilkes Booth in the diary. I'm not sure where the information gotten on this article was acquired because it doesn't seem to be cited, and I've never done an edit like this so I don't want to change it incorrectly, but I think this is worth looking into as a possible error in the wiki page. RoundSquare (talk) 01:17, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]