Jump to content

Talk:John IV of Ohrid/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 10:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I propose reviewing this article which I see has been waiting 8 months for review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First reading

[edit]

In general, it is well-written and short, but its length is not material if little is known about him.

  • The lead is too short. Please add a few more sentences summarising the main body of text.
  • "He was born ..." Start the main text with his full name.
  • His date of death is contradictory as between the infobox and the opening part of the text.
  • "His uncle raised him ..." This sentence is rather long and would benefit from splitting.
  • "if Paul Gautier's dating of a letter he received from the philosopher Michael Italikos to Christmas 1142 is correct." I don't understand the reference to Christmas here.
  • "This title apparently fell into disuse ..." This sentence is also rather long and would benefit from dividing.
  • "The couple had four children, of which two died in young age" Perhaps "at a young age".
Hi Cwmhiraeth, a big thank you for taking this on. I think I have addressed the points you raised above. Can you give it another look? And of course, any suggestions for improvement, beyond GA requirements, is appreciated. Cheers, Constantine 13:02, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Cplakidas: I am satisfied with your improvements and the expanded lead. I don't suppose there are any images available? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:39, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Cwmhiraeth, unfortunately not, not even a seal of office or something similar that might serve the purpose. Constantine 20:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

[edit]
  • The article is well written and complies with MOS guidelines on prose and grammar, structure and layout.
  • The article uses several reliable third-party sources, and makes frequent citations to them. The sources are mostly not available to me and are accepted in good faith. I do not believe the article contains original research.
  • The article covers the main aspects of the subject and remains focussed.
  • The article is neutral.
  • The article is stable.
  • There are no images because none are available.
Thanks again for taking the time, and for your suggestions. Constantine 10:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]