Talk:John Harold Clapham

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Name move

I have moved this article name from "John Clapham" to "John Clapham (economic historian)" since John Clapham (historian and poet) seems more notable. The latter could be moved to "John Clapham" and/or a DAB page could be created for (at least) these two. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason to believe John Clapham (1566–1619) is more notable: for instance, he was only a clerk in a ministry, while this John Clapham was vice head of one of the most important cultural institutions of Europe. Nemo 21:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's difficult to directly compare the value of the output of poets and economists. Certainly John Clapham (1566–1619) was not a professor and was never knighted. But he does have precedence by some 300 years. I'm not sure what you mean by "vice head". If you wish to undo the move, I would not object. But it might be better to first agree how these two individuals could be more easily disambiguated. Perhaps a DAB page is all that is required. If Sir John really is more notable, I'd suggest his article needs quite a lot more work when compared with that of John Clapham (historian and poet). Martinevans123 (talk) 21:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not aware of birth date or article length being criteria for disambiguation purposes, but sure it's nice if someone can improve articles. As for "vice head", it's just my translation to modern terminology of "Vice-Provost"; do you have better suggestions on how to compare the respective public offices? Nemo 15:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't suggesting that they should be. Only that they might give some indication of relative notability. If we had a disambiguation page then perhaps this John should become "the John Clapham" again. But the views of other editors on that would be useful, I think. I'm quite happy calling a Vice-Provost a Vice-Provost, or at least a Pro-vice-chancellor. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image

The image appears to be of something completely different. I have left a query with the uploader. Martinevans123 (talk)

The uploader has now updated the image. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]