Talk:John Byron (died 1600)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Some Mistake Surely?

His son Sir John Byron was born 1599 and became the first Baron Byron, succeeded in 1652 by his brother Richard Byron - born in 1606. Assuming this man was his father this was 6 years posthumously. Streona (talk)Streona

I have corrected the death date - it was in fact 1625. http://thepeerage.com/p19720.htm#i197200 --Streona (talk) 02:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC) Hang about - that makes him 99 years old! --Streona (talk) 02:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two different people. I have renamed the "Senior" and "Junior" articles as there are three generations: John Byron (died 1576), John Byron (died 1600), and John Byron (died 1625). jnestorius^(talk) 23:42, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gratuitous genealogy, anachronistic puffery, original research

The material that keeps getting added here violates WP:NOTGENEALOGY, WP:UNDUE, WP:NOR, and much of it lacks any source whatsoever, let alone a reliable one. Likewise it is completely anachronistic to pretend that people who lived in medieval or early-modern times used the puffed up styles that came to be popularized in the Victorian era and beyond. Please quit violating Wikipeida policy. Agricolae (talk) 10:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]