This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Getting the refs for this is somewhat of a tough job. I found exactly one and it did not contain any of the info in the article. I can't check on the others because you can't get them on the Internet. The topics in braces appear to be machine-generated. My guess is no notes are in here because the supposed "references" were machine-generated and do not really relate to the article. Whoever did it didn't really work up any notes. The whole article is repeated word for word a number of times but one repetition does give Wikipedia credit. Well, what are we do do? I wish I knew. Someone needs to sit down in a Britsh library and and spend a few hours hauling paper around. Anyone willing to do that? If not I suggest we just mark it for deletion, unless you want to have only his publications, which are easily verifiable. I notice Wikipedia is often dominated by system types, who know the most about programming and think they know about everything else, but do not. What good is this, guys? In the end it is unverifiable even though perhaps nearly all true.Dave (talk) 18:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:John Bryan Ward-Perkins/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
a good assesment of his life but updates are needed concerning his children: hugh has now ben offered the position as the director of the Verona Conservatory, which he has accepted and his daughter catherine-- which you failed to mention-- is a skilled ancient stained glass restorer.
212.155.113.242 (talk) 16:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Last edited at 16:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC).
Substituted at 20:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
