Talk:Joel Gilbert

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 25 July 2020, see discussion.
keep, 22 December 2012 (UTC), see discussion.
delete, 4 May 2012, see discussion.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A sandbox is available for this article at Talk:Joel Gilbert/sandbox. The sandbox may be helpful for drafting proposed edits.

Expanding and sourcing

Found sources available for further expansion:

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/obama_birther_movie_dreams_from_my_real_father.php
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6738534/site/todayshow/ns/today-entertainment/t/dylan-dvd-deserves-spot-shelf/#.UNfmo0X7KDh
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/24/taking-bob-dylan-at-faith-value/
http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/415215/Farewell-Israel-Bush-Iran-and-the-Revolt-of-Islam/overview
http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/film-presidents-father-not-barack-obama/
— Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelQSchmidt (talk • contribs) 02:36, December 24, 2012‎

Atomic Jihad Undue

The current discussion of Atomic Jihad seems to be WP:UNDUE. As opposed to the other films where reviews are from generally reliable sources and positive and negative comments are provided, the two positive reviews for Atomic Jihad are from highly marginal sources. The "Blogcritics" review (which is probably not a reliable source and which is actually from Confessions of an over-worked mom) hardly rises above the level of YouTube comments section. The Finnish review is similarly marginal from what I can tell (and the negative aspects of the review are not highlighted) and user contributed with no oversight mechanism. Both reviews are from user-generated content with no apparent editorial oversight of any form. I see that those sentences set up the discussion of the Obama flick, but think that the discussion of Atomic Jihad based upon these sources is undue weight to a film which does not warrant it. Deletion is probably appropriate for that content. By the way, the Atomic Jihad article on wikipedia is simply WP:Promotion. I have listed that page for deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomic Jihad. Thanks. AbstractIllusions (talk) 05:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Joel Gilbert's Nobel Prize according to BBC

The BBC broadcast Joel Gilbert rather than Bob Dylan when they announced Bob Dylan's Nobel Prize for Literature. Is this worthy of note in Wikipedia? BBC is a reliable source! Anyone skilled at editing in Wikipedia?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b07xpbql/bbc-news-at-six-13102016

19:50

https://www.facebook.com/groups/edlis.cafe/permalink/1201228023249061/

131.111.184.102 (talk) 16:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision Needed

Comment from blocked sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sweethominy for details.

Current version of article is not suitable for living person's biography. This is Wikipedia, not a tabloid. This article is under revision and not complete. Please do not continue reverting to old version. Sources and citations will be updated after general information is deemed correct. Users RoryWithMunchkins, and JGoldman76 have done the majority of the revising already but better sources are in order.

Work is in progress to turn it from the mildly libellous, out of date version to better follow wikipedia's guidelines. PLEASE DO NOT REVERT. Wikipedia's terms as far as living person articles are quite clear, repeated reversion to previous edits is harmful and could lead to ban.

Lost password to moderator account so this one is it for right now.

Message me if you have any questions. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HotNateDog (talk • contribs) 23:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just edited the article

So not trying to mess up anything, now that the problems have been explained a bit better I thought this most recent edit would be a bit better and not break any rules or step on any toes. Removing 'conspiracy theorist' was apparently a mistake so maybe this is a bit more equal as the article is pretty unbiased as it is. Just tryin to make it more neutral and less unsupported.

So this is more of a proposed edit, don't know how to propose this other than to edit. If you take it down please explain if you would. Sorry if this is a hot issue just trying to fix stuff JGoldman76 (talk) 05:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

please go to WP:COIN, find the mention of your account name and then and explain why you and two other accounts are working together to edit this article, please. Additionally, you need to stop adding unreliaable sources to articles, such as the Daily Mail and sources written by the article subject. Read WP:RS.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 12:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to draft and propose edits in the article sandbox at Talk:Joel Gilbert/sandbox. I've started the sandbox with the 04:14 version the article. Please take some time to read through our verifiability policy and reliable sources guideline before you draft your changes. Based on the reliable sources that are currently cited in the article, some variation of the term conspiracy theory is due in both the lead section and the article body. — Newslinger talk 04:24, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Struck comment from blocked sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sweethominy for details. — Newslinger talk 18:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The terror group dressed in green on a New York subway that attacked 2 innocent bystanders

It just came to me that in that comic strip with the “Elvis”so called interview the Obama men were dressed in green ! Quite a coincidence ! 152.117.107.94 (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]