Talk:Jinsafut

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

ARIJ and LRC reliability

I know these organizations are obviously pro-Palestinian, but I don't think their reliability is questionable in the case of the "Economy" section's content, especially the second passage which contains no controversy whatsoever. The first passage might attract disputes because of the "Since the beginning of the Second Intifada, vehicle movement in Jinsafut has been constricted by Israel, contributing to 93% of the working population being unemployed" segment. The figure is very high and I'm not totally sure if that would've been the case in 2004 when the article was published. Jinsafut does appear to be choked a bit by Israeli settlements - see town location here.[1] In any case, I am willing to change the last segment to "However, since the Second Intifada unemployment rates have grown considerably due to Israeli closures outside the town." --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The issue about the organizations being pro-Palestinian is less relevant than the quality of the sources (actually, lack of any) of the work published on the websites. I would tend to let 'bland' geographical information pass, but when it comes to statistics about land being confiscated, attributing unemployment rates to Israeli action rather than other factors such as municipal corruption. Also, I don't know how it's possible to report accurately about road closures. At the height of the violence, there were road closures and hundreds of checkpoints all over, but the situation has since changed drastically to allow much freedom of movement for Arabs. Frankly, I like to leave the geograpical articles as controversy free as possible unless their are multiple sources and notable issues to record. --Shuki (talk) 22:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually this is odd, I checked the LRC article and you're right on this one about the lack of sources used by the LRC. Usually ARIJ cites other sources such as the UNRWA, the mayor of a town or the municipal council. Most of these POICA articles are dominated by ARIJ (which is certainly more reliable than the LRC because of the use of citations), but there are also LRC manufactured articles which tend to lack credibility. For example the joint ARIJ and LRC source used in this article somewhat contradicts what the sole LRC source says. The ARIJ one says About 78% of the population used to depend on working in Israel and in the agricultural sector. After the construction of the Segregation Wall, a large percentage of the population became unemployed. I believe that the land use figures are factual (not very likely to be challenged) so I request that the tag for that passage be removed. The tag for the first passage is understandable; I'll try to find another source (unlikely there will be one). Until then the tag should remain. Do you oppose me taking the tag for the second passage though? --Al Ameer son (talk) 23:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not noticing earlier. The tag on the second claim is equal to the first with regard to this claim - "8% was confiscated". If the political claim is removed, then I wouldn't challenge the geographical claims. --Shuki (talk) 22:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, until a reliable source is found. --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jinsafut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Funduq

Start collecting sources for Al-Funduq, Huldra (talk) 22:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

163/177

Bibliography

Avi-Yonah, M. (1976). Gazetteer of Roman Palestine. QEDEM 5. Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and CARTA. p. 89. (Avi Yonah, 1976, p. 89)

Dorsey, David A. (1987). "Shechem and the Road Network of Central Samaria". Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research (268): 57–70. ("a ruin with Iron II pottery"; citing a 1972 Hebrew source.)

Kedar, B. Franks, Muslims and Oriental Christians in the Latin Levant. (several mentions)

Hmm, User:Zero0000, I don't seem to have any of the above (I thought I had the Avi-Yonah book, but apparently I'm mistaken.) Any suggestions? Huldra (talk) 23:22, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Huldra: Checking your email might be one option. Zero^talk 00:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]