This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jessica Reed Kraus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article was nominated for deletion on July 7, 2023. The result of the discussion was delete.
User:Ibjaja055 G4 does not apply here; the article is certainly substantially different from the original when it was nominated at AfD. Based on the comments, it included marginally-reliable sources like Newsweek, which this does not. SWinxy (talk) 01:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SWinxy Thank you for your explanation but the contest is almost the same. Most of the editors that voted delete based the subject's sources on routine coverages that do not meet WP:GNG or any of the WP:SNG. This is also the same here, the sources cannot establish the Notability of the subject.Ibjaja055 (talk) 01:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like you misunderstand what WP:G4 is for, which are articles that were put back up (copy and pasted) after a discussion and deletion, not articles wholly recreated from the ground up. Key phrase in G4 being sufficiently identical copies. If you think the subject is not notable, sure, tag it or bring it to AfD. But if it's not a copy, it can't be G4'd. SWinxy (talk) 02:15, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
