Talk:Jessica Mauboy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk · contribs) 13:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

It's hard to find flaws in this article

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
no problems here

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
well there seems to be some overlinking in the main article with "lead single" and "Snoop Dogg" wikilinked more than once; there are also terms that SHOULD be wikilinked like "live album", "choir", "Tamworth", "Los Angeles", "New York"
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
no problems here

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
no problems here

C. No original research:
no problems here
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
no problems here

B. Focused:
no problems here
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
no problems here
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
no problems here
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
no problems here

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
no problems here
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
The inconsistency of wikilinking isn't a major problem, so it's a pass