Talk:Jeopardy! Masters

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television game shows task force.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

Popular culture (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture articles

Game summaries and tables

I may absorb the "Winnings" table into the "Match summaries" table for clearer representation. Kindagoodplayer (talk) 14:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Been thinking about how to do this, can't think of an easy way. Any ideas on how I can combine the two to be clear? Kindagoodplayer (talk) 14:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing how "Winnings" would work with "Match summaries", but perhaps "Episodes" could be combined with "Match summaries" (by adding ratings to Match summaries)? (

Done [1]) I'm wondering if it might be good to mimic the leaderboard table (including tiebreaking information) from here, but this article is already pretty table-heavy. Hoof Hearted (talk) 15:10, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's much better, looks nice! Kindagoodplayer (talk) 17:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you looks great! Eruditess (talk) 20:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jeopardy! Masters Quarterfinals Leaderboard
Contestant	Total Match Points	TB #1 Games won	TB #2 Correct responses (including FJ!)	TB #3 Score (excluding FJ! & DD)	TB #4 Score (excluding FJ!)
Andrew He	4	1	41	31,400	37,400
James Holzhauer	3	1	49	38,400	69,200
Mattea Roach	3	1	32	22,400	25,600
Matt Amodio	3	1	29	22,000	36,600
Amy Schneider	2	0	31	24,000	25,400
Sam Buttrey	1	0	38	24,600	29,800

Game results are difficult to parse

Looking at the episode guide, it is a bit difficult to see who wins (with only the bold) and there are no hints for who came in second. Because of the template for the episode guide, you cannot edit the background colour of the cells.

Might it make sense to split the game results out, so the winners can have a gold background and the second-place have a silvery background?

Andrea Shubert (talk) 13:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I actually combined separate results and episode guide tables per the discussion above, because there was so much duplicate information. I was also trying to reduce the number of tables in this article. I agree that a colored background would be nice, but thought the standardization of the {{episode table}} was worth losing it. Personally, I don't think it's too hard to decipher the results, and fear a table full of multi-colored cells may push WP:COLOUR guidelines. Would summarized results in the |ShortSummary parameter work? (Although I think that makes the table less compact.) Hoof Hearted (talk) 14:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than "Contestant 1", 2 and 3 in the table heading, what about "Winner", "Second Place", "Third Place"? Is it important to know what order they stood on the stage? Hoof Hearted (talk) 17:40, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]