Talk:Jedna si jedina

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Jedna si jedina is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Purge and Merge

The author's fondness is touching, but it's POV. Remove the POV and merge to the main article. Interlingua ^talk 23:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree! Stijak 21:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need for Elaboration

May somebody elaborate why the two others community found themselves excluded by this anthem? -- Dans

This Anthem is good...It has words the new one is bull shit....This talks about the county of Bosnia not the Bosniak people...Why the Serbs and Croats don't like there own Country...????

I'm a Bosnian Croat and I love this anthem. In my opinion it doesn't exclude anyone, it even mentions the opposite. - Mayhemma —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayhemma (talk • contribs) 10:53, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They don't like it because 1)it's an old Muslim song and 2)they don't consider BH to be their country (at least the Serbs don't). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.175.73.126 (talk) 21:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics

Are the proper lyrics: "Zemljo hiljaduljetna" or "Zemljo tisućljetna"? Hiljadu is usually used by Bosniaks and Sverbs and tisuću by Croats, both words meaning thousand.80.80.40.208 (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright concerns

Song lyrics, even national anthem song lyrics, are frequently under copyright for many years after a song's creation. (See [1], for instance.) There are some on Wikipedia who feel that national anthems themselves should be treated differently (see Wikipedia:Lyrics and poetry), but this is not the official policy. Policy at WP:NOTLYRICS notes that "Most song lyrics published after 1922 are protected by copyright, and any quotation of them must be kept to a minimum, and used for the purpose of direct commentary or to illustrate some aspect of the style." See also Wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources. Whether the lyrics of former national anthems can be included as some "special" fair use or not, however, translations of them are subject to their own copyright. And since policy does not make exceptions for national anthems (current or former), as the administrator reviewing this listing I have no choice but to remove the lyrics altogether in compliance with our actual copyright policy. Please keep in mind the policy at WP:NOTLYRICS in developing this article. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jedna si jedina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140914180912/http://www.ustav-rbih.com/index-Dateien/himnarbih.htm to http://www.ustav-rbih.com/index-Dateien/himnarbih.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]