Talk:Jayden Daniels

Jayden Daniels has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 12, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 January 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by John from Idegon (talk · contribs) on 27 December 2019.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

California: Inland Empire Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Inland Empire task force (assessed as Low-importance).

College football High‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Football League Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona / District of Columbia / Louisiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Washington Commanders

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Washington Commanders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Washington Commanders and the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Washington CommandersWikipedia:WikiProject National Football League/Washington Commanders subprojectTemplate:WikiProject Washington CommandersWashington Commanders articles

GA Review

Passed. Riley1012 (talk) 15:15, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jayden Daniels/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Dissident93 (talk · contribs) 15:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 19:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will complete an initial review of this article within one week. -Riley1012 (talk) 19:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

...with 6 touchdowns en route to an appearance in the 2021 Las Vegas Bowl... to maintain consistency with the rest of the article and per MOS:NUMERAL, the 6 here should be written out (six).

2. Verifiable
Earwig is highlighting names of awards, no issues with this. No notes on the reference layout or reliable sources.
Spot check: 4, 6, 17, 19, 25, 28, 34, 36, 44, 48, 51, 56, 61, 69, 77, 85- no issues.

Ref. 3 notes he was 137 pounds his freshman year instead of 125?
Ref 6 and 15 are the same article.
55: ...he became the first player to complete at least 85 percent in consecutive games. Add a note with the clarification from the source that this requires attempting at least 20 passes in each game.

3. Broad

Is it necessary to have the notes with the game scores? Especially in sentences where it is already explained that the team won/lost?
I have a few notes on irrelevant details that I feel should be removed:

In April 2024, Regina was found to have violated NCAA guidelines by booking flights for recruits to visit Arizona State during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. This article is about Jayden, not his mother.
His favorite meal to prepare is spaghetti and other types of pasta, with his favorite snack being honey buns. Doesn't add anything important/notable

4. Neutral
No concerns with neutrality

5. Stable
No concerns with stability

6. Illustrated
The images are free use, relevant, and have suitable captions.

@Dissident93: Okay, that is all I have. Good job with this article- my suggestions are in bullet points. -Riley1012 (talk) 20:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I kept the Washington Post source regarding his weight (125lb) since the author of the article interviewed his family in San Bernardino for it, which should be more accurate than the other citation. "Is it necessary to have the notes with the game scores?" I only included scores in prose that were uncommon/notable (63-7). I can either add all scores to prose or remove the ones delegated to notes due not being super important. All other suggestions I agreed with and fixed or removed. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 22:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dissident93: Thanks for the quick response. Yeah, I would prefer the non-notable scores to be removed entirely- it does not seem to be common practice on other GA football biographies that I've seen. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I removed them. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 22:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.