Talk:Jay Wright Forrester
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jay Forrester's contrubutions
[edit]I am relatively new to editting Wikipedia pages, but as a member of the System Dynamics Society I thought it prudent to provide a better description of Jay Forrester's contrubutions to the field. Please feel free to make additional changes or leave comments here if you are not comfortable doing them youself and I will consider them in future updates.
Thanks,
-Bruce 8/5/2005
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 16:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Magnetic core memmory
[edit]Jay Wright Forrester developed magnetic core memmory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.242.91 (talk) 10:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Worksection removed
[edit]Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed the worksection of this article for now. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 08:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)P.S. I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also here. If you would like to assist in improving this article, please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. Thank you.
Sources
[edit]All the sources are dead for awards that Forrester is said to have won. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.21.104.93 (talk) 18:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Touché
[edit]"His early interest in electricity was possibly sparked by the fact that the ranch had none." Nicely worded. Xardox (talk) 08:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for this remark. That particular line is (almost) a direct quote from the source, so the required quotation marks are now added. -- Mdd (talk) 15:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
24.91.162.155 (talk) 02:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
"The Beginning of System Dynamics"
[edit]I enjoyed reading "The Beginning of System Dynamics",Banquet Talk at the international meeting of the System Dynamics Society Stuttgart, Germany, July 13, l989.
However, on pg 15, there seems to be a typo...
"There is now a promise of reversing the trend of the last century that has been moving away form the “Renaissance man” toward fragmented specialization."
It reads, "...moving away form the...", where it could be "...moving away from the..." I thought it was worth mentioning. Respectfully submitted, Ron 24.91.162.155 (talk) 02:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Jay Wright Forrester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150103005019/http://www.computerhistory.org/fellowawards/hall/bios/Jay,Forrester/ to http://www.computerhistory.org/fellowawards/hall/bios/Jay,Forrester/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150403184411/http://www.computerhistory.org/fellowawards/hall/bios/Jay,Forrester/ to http://www.computerhistory.org/fellowawards/hall/bios/Jay,Forrester/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150103005019/http://www.computerhistory.org/fellowawards/hall/bios/Jay,Forrester/ to http://www.computerhistory.org/fellowawards/hall/bios/Jay,Forrester/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Counterintuitive Behavior of Social Systems
[edit]this particular book is not important enough for a separate article DGG ( talk ) 08:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Removed material
[edit]I note Carchasm (after reversion subsequently backed by Materialscientist) removed half the next on this page as "bunk, original research, hagiography". I think this removal was much too extreme: it removed his publications, as well as all reference to Forrester's work with the Club of Rome and more generally his efforts at computer simulation of system dynamics. Dsp13 (talk) 11:57, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- I think that generally this field of study (i.e. applying techniques from engineering to social interaction) tends towards pseudoscience and rarely has any empirical justifications for its claims, so at a bare minimum we should have secondary sources supporting any claims being made, though we should be careful about which sources we use because there's a lot of woo in this particular area.
- As for the publications, typically we don't list out all the individual books and papers an author has published, only those whose importance and relevance to the article can be established. But I know there's some flexibility in this in practice, so if you want to re-add only the books and not the articles I don't have any objections. - car chasm (talk) 17:14, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with you there should be sourcing. I'm less worried about pseudoscience when (as here) the subject is historical. If it's OK, I'll revert your change, add citation needed tags and then have a go to see which material I can find sources for. Anything unsourced needs to go, as well as the puff. Dsp13 (talk) 19:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- That's a good point about history, I agree, I think that sounds like a fair way to proceed. - car chasm (talk) 15:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with you there should be sourcing. I'm less worried about pseudoscience when (as here) the subject is historical. If it's OK, I'll revert your change, add citation needed tags and then have a go to see which material I can find sources for. Anything unsourced needs to go, as well as the puff. Dsp13 (talk) 19:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- Start-Class vital articles in People
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Start-Class Nebraska articles
- Unknown-importance Nebraska articles
- WikiProject Nebraska articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Systems articles
- High-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in operations research
- WikiProject Systems articles