Talk:Japanese destroyer Sumire (1944)
Appearance
Japanese destroyer Sumire (1944) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 28, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese destroyer Sumire (1944)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 14:42, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
I'll snag this one. Parsecboy (talk) 14:42, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Short and sweet, only a few questions/comments:
- How the heck did it avoid coming under air attack during those last few months of the war?
- Maizuru is on the Sea of Japan and wasn't much attacked by the carriers.
- Ah, yes, that makes sense
- Maizuru is on the Sea of Japan and wasn't much attacked by the carriers.
- "at the time of the surrender of Japan" - specify when this was (and are we talking 15 August or 2 September? I'd probably wager that the ship was turned over after the surrender, as US forces wouldn't have arrived to have the ship turned over to them, but this is a minor quibble)
- Agreed
- Link target ship
- I prefer to do lists in the box for the ship power and propulsion fields (I find it looks a bit less cluttered), but that's up to you.
- I should have done that for the power field, but if I can fit them on one line, that's what I usually do.
- One last thing - you might mention in the lead that she saw no action during the war.
- @Sturmvogel 66:, see this one last item. Parsecboy (talk) 20:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ooops.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- No biggie, I sprang it on you after you replied to the review ;) Parsecboy (talk) 20:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ooops.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66:, see this one last item. Parsecboy (talk) 20:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Think that's it. Nice work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 14:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
When keel laid
[edit]Before I arbitrarily change the year this ship was laid down from '45 to '44, can anyone confirm this? A.J. Watts is no help, but I can't believe this was one of those magical vessels that were commissioned before they were laid down... Hungrydog55 (talk) 01:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- The sourced prose states 1944 Lyndaship (talk) 09:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles