Jump to content

User talk:Hungrydog55

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Hungrydog55, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! AustralianRupert (talk) 22:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Iwo Jima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Schmidt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Iwo Jima, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. (Hohum @) 16:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Template:Campaignbox New Guinea. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 02:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Guinea campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Papua. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bougainville campaign

[edit]

G'day, Hungrydog, thanks for your efforts with the Bougainville campaign article. There are a couple of places that still need refs, but overall it is looking much more detailed. When you get a chance, would you mind adding references to the places I've marked with "citation needed" tags? Thanks for your time. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk)

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Tarawa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 27th Infantry Division. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emperor of the North Pole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firebox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ralph C. Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your email to me

[edit]

Please note that I do not communicate via email regarding Wikipedia matters: I believe in openness.

I believe that you are referring to File:LTSR Electrocution Warning cropped.png. Since it is hosted at Commons, their deletion policy applies, which may be found at c:COM:D. As this image was uploaded by yourself within the last seven days, you may use their speedy deletion criterion c:COM:CSD#G7, so try adding {{SD|G7}} to the file description page on Commons. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating this. There's a problem though in a lot of your ship links go to the ship index page instead of the individual ship. I've done the first section to example the error but the rest still need doing Lyndaship (talk) 14:34, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand. Can you give me an example of one where the link isn't proper? Hungrydog55 (talk) 15:34, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Battle off Samar section Japanese cruiser Takao Lyndaship (talk) 15:37, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the heads-up. Hungrydog55 (talk) 16:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Hungrydog55. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A toast sandwich for you!

[edit]
Great article creation in Okinawa naval order of battle! Keep it up! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 08:38, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! It was a labor of love, as so many articles are. Stay tuned for one on the invasion of Leyte. (talk · Hungrydog55 (talk) 16:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Les Misérables into List of Les Misérables characters. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible repeating information?

[edit]

I think the "Opposing forces" section you added on Battle of Guam (1944) might be repeated in the "Order of Battle" section lower down on the page. I could be wrong. Sandenig (talk) 12:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Moscow order of battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mariana Islands naval order of battle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 20:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The draft namespace is for article construction! Please use it. buidhe 20:57, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gilbert Islands naval order of battle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Central Pacific and Makin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orders of battle

[edit]

I undid your revisions to the Seven Days order of battle articles for both the Union and Confederate armies before realizing that you had made these changes elsewhere. I object to them and do not see them as more user-friendly. I find them much harder to navigate. I don't think that it's necessary to include photographs of commanders either and it comes across to me as unnecessary clutter. Have you sought consensus for any of these changes? If not, I think that this should be done before you make any further alterations. Display name 99 (talk) 21:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Barbarossa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PVO and VVS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Case Blue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southwestern Front.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philippine Sea order of battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porpoise-class submarine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Easier Way to Build Orders of Battle

[edit]

I noticed you are creating new map symbol files to build articles on organization of forces in historic battles. You might find it easier or faster to use the Mil Map Symbol template. It will give you more colour options without uploading new files:

However, to use it for bullets, you need to build your lists inside tables:

Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4

CdnMCG (talk) 22:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It may seem like a small thing, but the square ones are smaller and they fit better. Also, when I create my own, the thick white frame shows up much better against dark backgrounds. I will check out the rectangular ones. Hungrydog55 (talk) 17:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think I just figured out what you mean by the template. I have started doing that. Hungrydog55 (talk) 18:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you prefer squares, Template:Mil Map Symbol works with those too, and it can give fill colours if they are transparent fills.
CdnMCG (talk) 02:24, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Tarawa order of battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Pacific.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Battle of Guam (1944) order of battle. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Order of battle for the Battle of Berlin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish 3rd Infantry Division.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Saipan order of battle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages LST and Richard Rothwell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your sandbox pages

[edit]

Hi, I stumbled across one of your sandboxes while updating links to a deleted category. Most of these should not be kept, according to WP:COPYARTICLE. Please would you look through Special:PrefixIndex/User:Hungrydog55/, and blank the copies of articles that you no longer need? If you would like them to be deleted, please tag them with {{db-author}}. – Fayenatic London 15:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your wish is my command. Reduced by half. Hungrydog55 (talk) 12:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Guadalcanal naval order of battle
added a link pointing to Farragut-class destroyer
Philippine Sea order of battle
added a link pointing to Farragut-class destroyer

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Invasion of Leyte naval order of battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Dakota-class battleship.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Medal of Honor recipients for World War II, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Henderson Field and Bougainville.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chuuk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Order of battle for Amoy Operation
added a link pointing to SNLF
Order of battle for the Hainan Island operation
added a link pointing to SNLF

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of ships of the Imperial Japanese Navy
added a link pointing to Port Arthur
Order of battle at Jutland
added a link pointing to Tufton Beamish

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wanted to explain why I've reverted the additions you made to the plot. The plot is already far too long at 1570 words, and your edits make things much worse, expanding it to over 2700 words. Have a look at [[WP:NOVELPLOT]] which explains why plots should normally not exceed 700 words. Amendments to reduce the existing length would be appreciated. MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:47, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Allied order of battle for Operation Tungsten
added links pointing to Town-class cruiser, W-class destroyer and S-class destroyer
Allied order of battle for Operation Mascot
added a link pointing to S-class destroyer
Operation Battleaxe order of battle
added a link pointing to Matilda tank

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution {second request)

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Operation Downfall into Orders of battle for Downfall. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re-formatting articles

[edit]

Hi Hungrydog55. I've noticed you've been working on reformatting various "Order of Battle" articles. Please keep the following WP:MOS related things in mind when doing so.

  1. Please don't add images, flag icons or any other icons to section headings because this is doing so isn't in accordance with MOS:ACCIM and MOS:HEAD.
  2. Please try as much as possible not to add WP:WIKILINKS to section headings (particularly piped links) as explained in MOS:HEAD. Any link you would add to a section heading can almost certainly be better added using either a WP:HATNOTE like Template:Main or by adding the link directly to prose in the section.
  3. Please don't set thumbnail images to a fixed pixel size as explained in WP:THUMBSIZE. If you'd like to make an image bigger or smaller, you can do so by scaling the image as explained in MOS:UPRIGHT.
  4. Please don't use code like "big" to try and make section headings or other article content larger. Section headings will be automatically sized according to their respective level, and the size of in-body text should be for the same for the most part because it makes it much easier to read for most user regardless of the type of device they're using.
  5. Before you completely reformat an article, it can be good practice to take a peek at the page's history or the article's talk page (including any archives) to see whether the formatting of the article has been discussed before and whether a consensus was determined regarding it. You shouldn't unilaterally reformat an article if a consensus has already been established for it to be a certain way. It's also allows you to see whether any formatting corrections were made by others. I had gone and cleaned up Operation Grapeshot order of battle to try and bring in more in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines, but your subsequent reformatting reintroduced a lot of the things that I had corrected.

Finally, if you're going to be reformatting many more of these articles, you might want to consider joining WP:MILHIST (if you're already haven't) since the members of MILHIST probably would be a good source of information and general guidance when it comes to article related to military subjects. In addition, to Wikipedia-wide policies and guidelines, some WikiProjects have also established guidelines for articles that fall within their scope in order to try and keep said articles as consistent as possible. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All good advice. Thanks. Hungrydog55 (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just a friendly reminder about user page categorization.

I have noticed your sandbox page linked above is appearing in regular content categories. See for example Category:Japan in World War II-related lists under N. This is discouraged. See WP:DRAFTNOCAT and WP:USERNOCAT for additional information.

Usually this is remedied by placing a leading colon at the beginning of each category declaration like this:

[[:Category:Ships of the Imperial Japanese Navy|*]] [[:Category:Japan in World War II-related lists|Navy ships and war vessels]] [[:Category:World War II naval ships of Japan|**]]

or, by bracketing all category declarations with Template:Draft categories like this:

{{Draft categories|
[[Category:Ships of the Imperial Japanese Navy|*]]
[[Category:Japan in World War II-related lists|Navy ships and war vessels]]
[[Category:World War II naval ships of Japan|**]]
}}

Either method will disable the category function. If you could please take care of this, it would be much appreciated.

Thank you. Cheers! --DB1729talk 01:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Dragoon order of battle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages XIV Corps and L-class destroyer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Allied vessels involved in Operation Neptune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Breakwater.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chuuk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just a friendly reminder about user page categorization.

I've noticed your user page (linked above) is appearing in regular content categories. This is discouraged. See WP:DRAFTNOCAT and WP:USERNOCAT for additional information.

Usually the situation is remedied by placing a leading colon at the beginning of each category declaration like this for example:

[[:Category:United States in World War II-related lists]]

or, by bracketing all category declarations with Template:Draft categories like so:

{{Draft categories|
[[Category:United States Navy in World War II|List, Losses]]
[[Category:World War II naval ships of the United States|.Losses]]
[[Category:United States Navy lists|World War II, Losses]]
[[Category:Lists of ships of the United States|World War II, Navy losses]]
[[Category:Military history of the United States during World War II|Navy losses]]
[[Category:Lists of World War II ships|United States Navy losses]]
[[Category:United States in World War II-related lists|Navy losses]]
}}

Either method will disable the category function. Thank you. Cheers! --DB1729talk 02:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article War and Peace characters order by appearance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War and Peace characters order by appearance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

‡ El cid, el campeador talk 17:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chuuk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Borneo campaign (1945) order of battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Whitehead.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Order of battle at the Battle of Tsushima, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yokosuka Naval Base and Inland Sea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Royal Canadian Navy ships of the Second World War, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Breakwater, V-class destroyer and Tribal-class destroyer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Order of battle at the Battle of Tsushima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pacific Theatre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]