Talk:Japanese destroyer Keyaki (1944)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 10:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 10:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- In the infobox, the stricken and fate fields aren't used which is unusual
- the Second Fleet on 1–20 April suggest "the Second Fleet from 1–20 April"?
- Presumably no links for the Destroyer Squadron and/or Division?
- I don't think that I have anything that even lists the various squadrons and their divisions, so not even a redlink.
- The division was disbanded suggest specifying which division, presumably Destroyer Division 53?
- Yep, the last one mentioned.
- Japanese personnel in 1945–1947 suggest "Japanese personnel from late 1945 to 1947"
- Rohwer is listed in the bibliography but not actually cited.
- Image tags check out OK, but I suggest putting the Keyaki one in the infobox rather than use the sister ship image.
That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 10:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- I am happy with this one so am passing as GA, I consider it meets the relevant criteria. Zawed (talk) 07:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)