Talk:Japanese destroyer Keyaki (1944)

Japanese destroyer Keyaki (1944) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 6, 2020. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Japanese destroyer Keyaki (1944) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Japan: Military history Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:14, November 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese destroyer Keyaki (1944)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 10:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. Comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 10:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the infobox, the stricken and fate fields aren't used which is unusual
the Second Fleet on 1–20 April suggest "the Second Fleet from 1–20 April"?
Presumably no links for the Destroyer Squadron and/or Division?
- I don't think that I have anything that even lists the various squadrons and their divisions, so not even a redlink.
The division was disbanded suggest specifying which division, presumably Destroyer Division 53?
- Yep, the last one mentioned.
Japanese personnel in 1945–1947 suggest "Japanese personnel from late 1945 to 1947"
Rohwer is listed in the bibliography but not actually cited.
Image tags check out OK, but I suggest putting the Keyaki one in the infobox rather than use the sister ship image.

That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 10:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks for reviewing this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy with this one so am passing as GA, I consider it meets the relevant criteria. Zawed (talk) 07:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]