Talk:Jan Peerce

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Opera

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Untitled

I had the pleasure of hearing and later meeting Jan Peerce in a San Francisco recital in the spring of 1977. Although Peerce was then in his early seventies, he still had a strong, clear, resonant voice. He was also a very pleasant, warm-hearted individual. Being a fan of Toscanini, I would have loved to ask him about his work with the Maestro, but there simply wasn't time since others also wanted to meet Peerce. Nevertheless, I always treasure this opportunity to see "Toscanini's favorite tenor" in person. Sallyrob 17:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh this isn't a forum so what's your point?
70.69.36.29 10:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish-American

I think American citizens, no matter what their background, deserve better than to be given hyphens to denote their supposed ethnicity. "(Fill-in-the-blank)-American" is a patronizing and, frankly, detestable manner of referring to someone who may be black-skinned, Jewish, indigenous to the land, Chinese, or whatever. It implies that the person in question has less claim upon citizenship in a country which is essentially comprised of people from other places. It is more than fine to denote Richard Tucker as Jewish, but it would come as a surprise to the reader to be informed that he was, unless otherwise given special designation, not actually American. Of course Tucker is American. The only qualification one might wish is for people who are in this country but not naturalized citizens. But if one has become a citizen, either by naturalization or by birth, there should be no hyphenated designation by which to separate them. Would one refer to George Washington as English-American because his forebears were English? I know Washington would have objected. Richard Tucker, I am hoping, would object to his hyphen too.

Therefore, I firmly believe that the hyphenated ethnic designation is either patronizing, bigoted, or both. Americans are American, and that should be the only requirement for so naming them. Otherwise, if one must make a distinction, Jewish will certainly do. --Jamesmarcus (talk) 23:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jan Peerce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jan Peerce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150103093022/http://www.thedailynewrochelle.com/news/new-rochelledid-you-know-12 to http://www.thedailynewrochelle.com/news/new-rochelledid-you-know-12

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]