Talk:James and the Giant Peach (film)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
List of Animated Films link
[edit]Do we really need this link? Yeah, Peach is animated, but then we would have to put List of Films at the bottom of every live-action movie page. There has to be only 1 animated film and including this link seems very vague.PowderedToastMan 05:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:James and the giant peach.jpg
[edit]Image:James and the giant peach.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC) This page says the musical is an adaptation of the film. It is not: the stage musical is based on the book, not the film. The play and the film are entirely different adaptations of the book, with different songs by different songwriters.
Why is this article protected from edits?
Tags
[edit]This article has no references or citations of any kind. This is especially problematic in a section that compares book and film, as the lack of references would tend to imply it is original research, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia. Hopefully, someone will attend to this. Wildhartlivie (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind the lack of citations; I just don't think a simplistic list of changes from the novel to the film is all that productive in an encyclopedia article. I've removed it. Thegreatcurve (talk) 11:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Kingdom Hearts
[edit]Differences
[edit]
|
I have removed the differences between the source and the film and placed them here. If anyone wants to re-add them, please integrate them into the article, preferably in "Production", and provide sources to establish notability. BOVINEBOY2008 11:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
New Release Date For The DVD Version
[edit]According to UltimateDisney.com, James and the Giant Peach will make it's Blu-Ray + DVD combo pack debut on August 3, 2010. Seven weeks later on September 14, it will be released as a stand alone DVD, the same day as the new release of the 25th Anniversary Edition of The Black Cauldron. Koolz03 (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Nostalgia Critic
[edit]He has an evil review of the film, he says "Slow mo!" He never loves that movie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.219.21.214 (talk) 15:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 30 August 2016
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
[Paste of the entire article snipped. —User:Trivialist]
2602:306:33C5:1860:BD94:DBA4:7CCC:DF3C (talk) 22:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Trivialist (talk) 22:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on James and the Giant Peach (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090204014801/http://www.close-upfilm.com/features/Featuresarchive/roalddahl.htm to http://www.close-upfilm.com/features/Featuresarchive/roalddahl.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0%2C%2C292168%2C00.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://homecinema.thedigitalfix.co.uk/content/id/72573/james-and-the-giant-peach-us-bd-in-august.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Post-credits Scene
[edit]Why is there no mention of the film’s post-credits scene on this page? 92.60.192.241 (talk) 20:47, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Annecy Cristal winner
[edit]Why can't I put the Category:Annecy_Cristal_for_a_Feature_Film_winners on this page since it actually did won the prize?
- Hi Espngeek, if it did win the prize, then find a reliable citation for that and add the information (and year date) to the article itself. Categories can only be added if the information already exists, and is cited, in the article. Softlavender (talk) 22:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- Got it: https://www.annecy.org/about/archives/1997/award-winners Espngeek (talk) 23:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Adaptations section - The musical is not an adaptation of the film. It is based on the book.
[edit]Why is this article protected?
This page says that the stage musical is based on the film but it is not. The stage musical is a totally unrelated adaptation of the novel, not based on the film. I want to correct the error but I can't because the article is protected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.6.162.236 (talk) 19:52, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Adaptations section - The musical is not an adaptation of the film. It is based on the book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.6.162.236 (talk) 19:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
box office bomb
[edit]Is the reason for the film's failure that it was released under The Walt Disney Pictures label or the release date? I think it would have succeeded if it was released under the Touchstone label instead because it's rated PG like the The Nightmare Before Christmas which was a success at the box office either due to positive reviews or being released on October 29 which is near Halloween. --Evope (talk) 03:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2019
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Adaptations" section should be removed. The stage musical is based on the book, not the film. It should not be listed as an adaptation of the film. Dannypittstoller (talk) 12:28, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2021
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2601:18A:0:9070:D9C7:28C:81D5:4976 (talk) 01:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ◎ | melecie | t 06:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2021
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Felicity Dahl is Roald Dahl's widow, not his son.
Felicity Dahl, Roald's son and executor of his estate,
should be replaced with
Felicity Dahl, Roald's widow and executor of his estate, AldenMB (talk) 02:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Done Softlavender (talk) 04:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Edit Request
[edit]While the crocodile tongues are able to make things like James' miserable life into a happy one, it is never mentioned that they can make things grow to a colossal size. Tmw00032 (talk) 05:33, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit Request
[edit]James doesn't eat through the peach. He grabs a piece of it (and one of the crocodile tongues jump into that piece thereby turning him into an animated figure). Then the tunnel opens in the bottom of the peach. James climbs into the peach through that tunnel. Tmw00032 (talk) 05:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit Request
[edit]All punctuation goes inside of quotations. Tmw00032 (talk) 06:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class British cinema articles
- British cinema task force articles
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- Start-Class Animated films articles
- Low-importance Animated films articles
- Animated films work group articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- Start-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class American animation articles
- Low-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- Start-Class European animation articles
- Low-importance European animation articles
- European animation work group articles
- Start-Class Stop motion articles
- Low-importance Stop motion articles
- Stop motion work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- Start-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- Start-Class Roald Dahl task force articles
- Unknown-importance Roald Dahl task force articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- Start-Class Disney articles
- Low-importance Disney articles
- Start-Class Disney articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Disney articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles