Talk:James Dale Davidson

This page was proposed for deletion by UnitedStatesian (talk · contribs) in the past.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

POV

I've put a {{POV check}} tag to the article, as it seems to be largely written using first person voice and contains questionable language (such as "suckers"), and no sources are stated. –Mysid (talk) 11:10, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I will revert the whole article to the last version by User:Cnwb (thus removing all POV edits by 216.230.150.7) within a week or so if no-one objects. –Mysid (talk) 11:15, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Some discussion about this is in my talk archive (please don't post replies there, though). –Mysid 06:51, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some details on Davidson's career and also removed the "journalist" stub. Though he has co-authored some books, he is not a journalist per se.--Mantanmoreland 04:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He's a scam artist or is at least affiliated with scammers. The article should be deleted. Tried to put in source link but it's on the blacklist 82.134.91.66 (talk) 20:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Being a "scam artist" (if that's what he is) does not preclude an entry in Wikipedia if that article is accurate. It may indeed serve as a warning to others Joalkap (talk) 14:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Predictor?

Is this claim made in "The Horn News" correct? "James is the lone economist who predicted the fall of the Soviet Union, the stock market crash of 2000 and 2008, as well as the real estate bubble that hit in 2006."137.159.184.234 (talk) 02:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. His predictions were largely vague (or wrong) about just when these events would occur and mixed in with other predictions that turned out to be false (see article and references cited). There were many other doomsayers who made similar baskets of predictions of variable accuracy. It's a bit like the psychics who make a host of predictions for the coming year and then then tout only the ones that turned out to be right. (And Davidson is an "economist" only because he calls himself one. He has no degree in the field nor has he published in peer-reviewed economics journals. He is more accurately a financial pundit, of which the world has many.)Joalkap (talk) 14:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential prediction

Clinton twice only won because of Perot's participation whose voices would otherwise go to Dole and Dole would have won. --212.186.7.98 (talk) 08:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An opinion piece,

This article feels like one of the most "opinion piece" type articles on Wikipedia and seems to speak of a decline to the quality of Wikipedia.

Doesn't give a lot of information just a few negative things, so I'm trying to find more out about this guy but this seems like it was written by someone who hates him.

And therefore I'm not able to write about this guy and give context to my writing. 2001:14BA:21FE:6B00:90CB:A9D3:DE9A:5877 (talk) 20:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]