Jump to content

Talk:James Cameron/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HAL333 (talk · contribs) 16:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an admirer of Cameron, hopefully it'll be a good article. ~ HAL333 16:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): checkY
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): checkY (My only thought is that you remove the references from the lede per MOS:LEADCITE)
    b (citations to reliable sources): checkY
    c (OR): checkY


d (copyvio and plagiarism): checkY

  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): {[Check mark}}
    b (focused): checkY
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: checkY
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.: checkY
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): checkY
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions): checkY

Overall: Great Job on the article!
Pass/Fail: