Talk:Jaguar XJ (X351)

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daimler

Is there a Daimler version of the car ? Hektor (talk) 20:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not as far as I know although there may be later as X350 did get a Daimler version.

All New

Is this car really all-new? I'm not sure that it is. It may look very different but I'm sure that most of the aluminium floor pan is carry-over X350.
LewisR (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not just the floorpan but suspension, engines, and transmission are all developments of the earlier car. Not "all new" at all except in appearance
DesmondW (talk) 14:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Phew!! I thought I was going mad for a minute. This isnt, then a "Mark 4" at all. It is, essentially, a restyle and tweak of the X350. This is no bad thing at all but it's wrong to say that it is all-new. IMO, the entire "Mark" designation for the XJ series and models is incorrect. I worked at Whitley and there has never been such a designation. I also call into question the X308 designation too. Ah, the AJ133 engine is, I understand, a new engine ovre the AJXX range. Hence the 3-digit code.
LewisR (talk) 19:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unclarity

"Production of the car is due to begin in September 2009, with first deliveries being made in early 2010.[5] However, the sale was delayed to December.[6]"

This is badly written and makes no sense. 82.70.144.30 (talk) 22:52, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Has anyone actually seen one on the road yet?Mr Larrington (talk) 14:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diesel in US?

The diesel version isn't available in the US, is it? --76.115.67.114 (talk) 03:15, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use in motorcades.

The motorcades in whict X351 is escorted by Range Rover look quite awkward. СЛУЖБА (talk) 08:45, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3.0 V6 supercharged petrol, top speed?

Would somebody care to change the top speed of the 3.0 V6 supercharged petrol engine as I am sure it isnt 75 mph (121 Km/h). I would do it myself only i'm not 100% sure on the correct top speed. yesilikecars (talk) 12:45, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

This error is now fixed. Warren (talk) 15:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

4WD/AWD?

Jaguar mentions 3.0 V6 AWD model in current XJ Specifications [1]. (Without telling exact type and manufacturer of 4WD system, however.)

It definitely deserves mentioning. 109.174.50.37 (talk) 09:09, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jaguar XJ (X351). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]