Talk:Jagdgeschwader III

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jagdgeschwader III article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Jagdgeschwader III has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 9, 2018. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Jagdgeschwader III appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 February 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in July 1918, Jagdgeschwader III faced the problem of self-igniting ammunition?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jagdgeschwader III.

Wikipedia

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jagdgeschwader III/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 08:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 08:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

GA Criteria

GA Criteria:

1
1.a Y

1.b Y
2
2.a Y

2.b Y

2.c Y

2.d Y (14.5% is highest, due to incidental parallels.)
3
3.a Y

3.b Y
4
4.a Y
5
5.a Y
6
6.a Y

6.b Y

No DAB links Y
No Dead links Y

Prose Suggestions

Lede

and wanted to assign a fighter wing to each of three attacking Armees. suggest you change this to and wanted to assign a fighter wing to each of the three Armees involved in the attack.
- Excellent suggestion. Slight rewrite.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
not to mention frequent changes of airfields during withdrawals, suggest along with frequent changes of airfields during withdrawals,
- Done.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Operational history

Flying was kept to a bare minimum. JG III husbanded its resources while awaiting the upcoming offensive. suggest Flying was kept to a bare minimum, as JG III was husbanding its resources while awaiting the upcoming offensive.** Done.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Georgejdorner: That is all of my comments, passing now. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Many thanks for a speedy review.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]