Talk:Jacques-François Blondel

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

family ties??

The article states that he is the grandson of Nicolas-François Blondel. Can anyone actually find a source for that? Because I can't.....

It seems unlikely that Jacques-François is the the grandson of (Nicolas-)François, given the large difference in their ages. The information is based on an antiquarian bookseller website, unlikely to be an entirely reliable source. Neither the Macmillan Encyclopedia of Architects nor The Dictionary of Art, both of which have articles on these men (as well as several other Blondel architects), mentions a relationship between them. Personally I think it should be removed from the article unless a reliable confirming source is found. --Robert.Allen (talk) 11:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clearing that up and for improving the article.

Since you seem to know more about architecture than me, and seem better equipped with literature, maybe you want to double-check my changes to the "Stairs" article, which I tried to explain and justify on its talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Stairs#Which_Blondel.3F.3F.3F Otto von B. (talk) 10:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jacques-François Blondel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051217225649/http://www.iconoclastbooks.com/jfblondel.html to http://www.iconoclastbooks.com/jfblondel.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]