Jump to content

Talk:Jack Duckworth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleJack Duckworth was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 4, 2011Good article nomineeListed
March 9, 2011Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Untitled

[edit]

In Response to: It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Vera_Duckworth. (Discuss)

I disagree. Two totally different characters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RandomDan (talkcontribs)

Oppose: Two completely different characters. LBM 22:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Oppose: Per above Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 20:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Oppose. It looks like there's consensus for keeping it where it is and I will remove the tag. Deb 18:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1974

[edit]

well vera appeard in 1974 so jack should be down as 1974 NOT 1979 as his first appered in November 28th 1974.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 21:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheep 2009 (talkcontribs) 18:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right ok Jack appeared in 1979 and not 1974 and for anyone who wants prove here it is——http://www.itv.com/soaps/coronationstreet/characters/f-lcharacters/jackduckworth/ brian moore (talk) 22:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Jack Duckworth/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article is good but before I can pass it, please complete a full copyedit (proofread). I made a couple of changes but there are still a few missing words here and there. Otherwise, it is in good shape.

Reviewer: Hugahoody (talk) 19:36, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a little. Would you mind pointing out some copy edit changes I need to make please. I'm easily confused and knowing me I'll make the part with bad grammer worse. I know I'm a pain.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 22:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think you've done it really. Hugahoody (talk) 22:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Jack Duckworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]